100% renewable geothermal methanol
A geothermal powerplant extracts heat from Earth’s core, either exploiting natural vapour and hot water circulation, or through water injection and steam collection. The water/vapour stream is however not made of pure water but contains contaminants, in large proportions CO2. Therefore, even if fully renewable, power generation in geothermal plants releases CO2, on average about 45 gCO2/kWh.
However, CO2 concentration in flue gas is quite high, facilitating its capture. CO2 and electricity availability creates the perfect conditions for a methanol plant, as electricity allows hydrogen production through electrolysis. Carbon Recycling International (CRI) built such a unit in Grindavik, Iceland and branded its renewable methanol as vulcanol.
The main drawback of relying on a geothermal source for power, heat and CO2 is its low temperature (60-180°C), which is below the optimum temperature for the methanol reactor as well as (too) low for the separation and distillation steps. Management of excess heat from the reactor becomes critical, while compression (running on electricity) must be favoured over heating when possible (CO2 and H2 compression upstream reactor, pressurised lower distillation column).
CRI’s plant annually produces 4,000 tCH3OH, avoiding the release of 5,600 tCO2 and relying on an industrial-scale electrolysis unit fed with 100% renewable electricity (800 tH2). As a scaling perspective, the annual Icelandic consumption of crude-based fuels is ~750,000 t, mostly in cars and fishing boats, vehicles that can be converted to CH3OH use. Yet, as methanol energy content is about half that of conventional crude-based fuels, a production of ~1,500,000 tCH3OH would be required.
According to CRI’s own published figures, producing 1 ton of methanol requires:
- Capturing 1.4 tCO2 from geothermal flue gas, itself requiring 0.8 MWh
- Producing 0.193 tH2 through electrolysis, consuming 8.25 MWh (efficiency of ~78%)
- Compressing CO2 and H2 before injection into the reactor, consuming 0.45 MWh of electricity
- Distillating the reactor products (recycling heat from the methanol reactor) to extract 0.59 tH2O
Total energy consumption is therefore 9.5 MWh, while the energy content of 1 tCH3OH is 5.58 MWh, leading to an energy to methanol efficiency of 58.7%.
By far, the main energy consumption item is the hydrogen production with electrolysis. Applying the same general approach to a CO2 source that can (at least partially) also provide some H2 would largely improve the overall efficiency. Such source exists, notably in blast furnaces in steel plants.